Since there is a little price difference, these are the two I have never used and wondering if anyone has here? Looking at the Bilstein 5100 vs Fox 2.0. Let me know what you run, ran or know about any shock for a lifted dmax for performance, reliability, and corrosion resistance.
Bilstein vs Fox shocks
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
-
We run both the Bilstien and the fox. Kinda customer preference. For most the Bilstien is a major upgrade from what they are running and always provide a great ride. Our 03 ccsb has the Fox shocks and 6in lift, I think it rides great!2006 LBZ Daily Driver, Tractor, School Bus, Hot Rod Diesel , Crew Cab, Lifted, Hunting Rig , Cowboy Cadillac
Comment
-
So Fox sounds to be more my preference of ride quality for on and off road. I understand people all drive differently and view performance of products differently as well, but I think the Fox 2.0s will be best friends with the kryptonite ucas. Soon those two will love my truck!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dukcaln@Dmaxstore
Enjoy.....!!! Sounds like a match made in heaven
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dukcaln@Dmaxstorei really think it boils down to personal perception on what the individual views as acceptable ride quality. Bilstein and fox can't go wrong depending on truck set up and what the truck is used for.
Mot people dont ever get a chance to run two different sets of shocks on the same truck they own let alone 3 or more so they rely on reviews from customers. That is what is so great ab out these kinds of threads
Comment
-
It's definitely mind boggling to hear different opinions lol. Either way I go I'm just looking for the front end to have more stiffness since there is so much weight there. I have thought about the 5100s with the remote resivoir up front, but heard foxs are more stiff.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dukcaln@Dmaxstore
Yes the Foxes with Res will be more stiffer. The Fox 2.0 are valved for the weight and off road and will be stiffer than the 5100's
Comment
Comment